World
Café: Conflict Resolution at the Crossroads
Notes
on concepts from Beyond Neutrality: Confronting the Crisis in Conflict
Resolution by Bernard Mayer—San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Wiley,
2004, taken at a presentation by Bernie Mayer at ACR Conference).
The actual panelists were Juliana Birkhoff, Robert Benjamin, and Marvin
Johnson. Association for Conflict Resolution, 30 September 2004
It’s time
to face some brutal facts: in the days and months after 9-11, where
were the conflict resolution leaders? They, we, our profession,
are not seen as major players in how to respond ot or understand
conflict. We are not seen as resources anywhere in almost any communities.
What are the
deepest conflicts, and why are we not playing a major role? This
is not about a marketing shortfall; rather, we don’t have
product that meets the needs.
People in conflict
don't turn to us. As a profession, we depend on mandatory referrals
or foundations for work. People don't think about neutral 3rd parties
when they think of conflict. They want allies, friends, advocates.
We've been dependent on forcing people to use us.
We’re
a supply-driven field. Practitioners have to find the work. We’ve
lost the major grant sources of the Pew Charitable Trust and the
Hewlett Foundation, which have funded so many conflict resolution
activities for so many years. Why? For one things, there is little
firm research that documents the benefits of our work.
We offer our
services as neutral 3rd parties. What people want is -- what? A
voice, validation, vindication, procedural justice, safety.
Therein lie
the opportunities. We need to look at 3 things:
1. Question
the concepts – for example:
- that conflict resolution is about moving people from differences
in positions and interests. Conflict resolution is not always about
collaboration and cooperation. There is a time for struggle.
- that we have any potential to bring about a level playing field.
We don’t. There is no such thing.
- that we’re always looking for win-win. We’re not.
- People don't always want a resolution, or think their conflicts
need resolving. We have something to offer at all stages. Sometimes
we need to deepen or manage conflict. We must think of ourselves
as there to help as constructive productive powerful conflict engagement
specialists.
2. Think about
roles. We have traditionally viewed ourselves as 3rd parties. But
there’s not an advocate role for all situations. There are
also ally roles. There's a change in collaborative and coaching
practitioners. We have to be willing to work with one side on their
goals.
3. We need to
produce systems to permit engagement in healthy ways. |